Why employment law firms lose to competitors

The problems we fix

  1. 01

    State-by-state wage-hour variation isn't reflected in your content

    California overtime is different from Texas overtime is different from New York overtime. Your firm represents employees across five states — but your content is written as if FLSA is the only relevant framework. Prospects searching state-specific wage-hour questions find generic 'know your rights' content and retain firms with state-specific content instead.

  2. 02

    Class-action prospects don't know they have a class-action case

    An individual prospect Googling 'I didn't get paid overtime' is often sitting on a collective-action or class-action claim against their employer. Your firm handles these exact cases — but the intake flow is built for individual wrongful-termination cases, so class-action prospects never get routed to the class-action attorney and the case walks away.

  3. 03

    Plaintiff and defense practices inside one firm split the SERP

    Your firm represents plaintiffs in some matters and employers in others (a common structure). On Google, that looks like a firm with split identity — and the SERP rewards pure-play plaintiff firms or pure-play defense firms who look focused. Without architectural separation of the two practice silos, both lose to specialists.

  4. 04

    EEOC matters and administrative practice is invisible on Google

    EEOC charge filings, right-to-sue letters, administrative-exhaustion timing, and state FEHA/DFEH equivalents are procedural landmines for plaintiffs. Your firm handles this daily — but the content isn't organized into a ranked silo, so prospects land on generic competitors or miss filing deadlines entirely.

Watch: 39 seconds

Someone just searched “employment lawyer near me.”

Whoever shows up and proves they've seen this before gets the case. See how pages for wrongful termination, discrimination, and unpaid wages turned into 680% more new callers.

0:00 / 0:00
Read the transcript

Right now, someone was just let go, and they're wondering if it was legal.

Firms with big budgets own page one. And a generic website doesn't show you've seen this before.

Meet Black Cat, built for employment law firms. Keough Law saw 680% more new callers in the last 90 days.

Pages that rank and get the call. Wrongful termination, discrimination, unpaid wages. Confidential, right where people search.

The right cases call you, and you'll know where every one came from.

Get your free website audit at blackcatwebsitedesign.com.

Why Employment Firms Choose Black Cat

One firm, two sides, fifty rulebooks. We rank all of it.

Employment law splits every way at once — plaintiff vs. defense, individual vs. class, and wage-hour rules that change at every state line. Collapse it into one 'employment attorney' page and the SERP hands the work to firms that look more focused than you are.

We build SEO only for law firms, and separation is where employment firms win. You get a strategist who architects distinct claim-type and jurisdiction silos — two focused specialties under one firm entity — so class-action signals get routed correctly instead of walking away as single cases.

  • Claim-type and jurisdiction silos that read as focused specialties
  • Class-action track-record content drafted to ABA Rule 7.1 disclosures
  • Plaintiff and defense practices separated so neither dilutes the other
Employment law firm reviewing separated plaintiff and defense content silos across offices

What we do

Built for employment law firms

01

Claim-Type + Jurisdiction Content Silos

Wage-hour, wrongful termination, discrimination, retaliation, harassment, whistleblower, non-compete, and FMLA each get their own content silo with jurisdiction-specific statutory content. California FEHA vs. Texas TCHRA vs. federal Title VII — each gets its own ranked silo instead of being collapsed into 'discrimination.'

  • Claim-type silos (wage-hour, wrongful termination, discrimination, retaliation, harassment)
  • Jurisdiction-specific statutory content (federal + state per office)
  • EEOC and state-agency administrative-practice silo
  • Non-compete / trade secret / whistleblower separate silos for enforcement variation
Claim-Type + Jurisdiction Content Silos

8claim-type silos, each with jurisdiction-specific authority

02

Class-Action Intake Architecture

Class-action detection starts at the search query. Prospects Googling 'I didn't get paid overtime' or 'everyone at my job is classified as exempt' are class-action signals that need different routing than individual wrongful-termination prospects. We build intake forms that detect class-action characteristics, route them to class-action attorneys, and surface the collective-action content that converts individual inquiries into certifiable class actions.

  • Class-detection intake forms (multiple-plaintiff signals, policy-level claims)
  • Collective-action content (FLSA §216(b) opt-in, Rule 23 class certification)
  • Commonality and numerosity educational content
  • Class-action track-record pages with compliance-appropriate disclosures
Class-Action Intake Architecture

03

Multi-State / Per-Office Jurisdictional Coverage

Each office gets its own Google Business Profile tuned to the state-specific practice mix that office handles. Geo pages for each state × claim-type combination. State-bar-specific content for employment-law-specialist certifications (California LSI, etc.) where applicable. Consistent firm authority across offices without state-law nuance getting flattened.

  • Per-office Google Business Profiles tuned to each state's practice mix
  • Geo pages for every state × claim-type combination
  • State-bar specialist-certification content where applicable
  • Consistent firm authority without state-law nuance getting flattened
Multi-State / Per-Office Jurisdictional Coverage

04

Plaintiff/Defense Practice Separation

If your firm represents both plaintiffs and employers, we separate the two practices into architecturally distinct content silos — with separate internal-linking structures, separate landing pages, and separate conversion funnels. Google sees two focused specialties under one firm entity; prospects get routed to the right side of the practice without ambiguity; and neither silo gets diluted by the other's authority.

  • Architecturally distinct plaintiff-side and defense-side silos
  • Separate internal-linking structures and conversion funnels
  • Bio attribution to the right attorneys on each side
  • Two focused specialties under one firm entity, neither diluted
Plaintiff/Defense Practice Separation

A clear, simple path

From split identity to stacked authority, in three steps

  1. 1

    Step 1

    Practice + Jurisdiction Audit

    We map how your plaintiff, defense, class-action, and multi-state practices compete against each other on the SERP today — then hand you a prioritized separation plan, even if you never hire us.

  2. 2

    Step 2

    Build the Silos

    Claim-type and state-specific statutory silos, class-detection intake routing, and separated plaintiff/defense funnels wired into per-office Map Pack coverage.

  3. 3

    Step 3

    Compound Each Specialty

    Every state build and authored commentary reinforces the right silo — and class-action signals convert individual inquiries into certifiable collective actions.

Get My Free Firm SEO Audit

Picture next quarter

Every claim type ranking, every class-action signal caught

Imagine a prospect Googling 'everyone at my job is misclassified' landing on collective-action content and routing straight to your class-action attorney — while your defense practice ranks as its own specialty.

  • State-specific wage-hour prospects find your content, not generic 'know your rights' pages.
  • Class-action signals route to the class-action attorney instead of walking away.
  • Plaintiff and defense practices each rank as focused specialties.
  • Non-compete and trade-secret work ranks in its own lower-competition silo.
  • Each office's Map Pack reflects the state-specific mix it actually handles.
  • EEOC and administrative-practice content stops prospects from missing filing deadlines.
Employment firm leadership reviewing class-action intake and per-state claim rankings

Keough Law · last 90 days

680%

more new callers

When attorney Shaun Keough partnered with Black Cat, his firm was leaving cases on the table online. We rebuilt the site and SEO around intake, and the phones started ringing: more qualified callers, more form submissions, and a steady climb up Google for the searches that sign clients.

“Black Cat is fantastic! Mike treats your website and marketing like it's his own. I noticed an increase in quality leads immediately.”
680%increase in new callers
210%more form submissions
71%more keyword rankings
142first-page keywords
Shaun Keough of Keough Law, a Black Cat client

Shaun Keough, Keough Law

The Black Cat Website Design team

Our promise to you

Partner with a team that believes in the Golden Rule

Switching to a new agency can feel overwhelming, and we understand the effort that comes with it. That's why we treat your marketing budget with the same care we'd want for our own. We're selective about our partnerships, but when you choose to work with us, we'll go above and beyond. Your trust means everything to us.
Mike Ferraro
Founder, Black Cat Website Design
Mike Ferraro's signature
Get my free website audit

The cost of a blurred practice

Every undifferentiated page is a specialty the SERP gives to someone else.

Common questions

Employment Law Firm SEO FAQs

Ready to win Employment Law Firm SEO?

Get a free SEO audit of your current rankings plus a custom plan, whether you hire us or not.

Free Website Audit

See What's Costing Your Firm Cases Online

A free, no-obligation website audit and the exact plan to fix it, in 30 seconds.

No credit card required
Results in 24-48 hours

By submitting, you agree to receive your audit results and occasional marketing emails. Unsubscribe anytime.